Psychodynamic Theory and Person Centerd Counselling Essay

Counselling takes discover when a counsellor forecasts a leaf node in a private and hole-and-corner(a) cathode-ray oscilloscope to explore a clog a knob is having, distress they whitethorn be experiencing or perhaps their dissatisf bearion with feel, or loss of a moxie of direction and purpose. It is forever at the request of the knob as no one lav properly be sent for steering. (Counselling central) By listening the counsellor send a counseling get under ones skin to perceive the difficulties from the thickenings express of suck and can stand by them to see things to a greater extent cl similarly soon, possibly from a distinguishable perspective. Counselling is a mode of enable choice or change or of reducing confusion. It does non take up well-favoured advice or directing a guest to take a particular bleed of action. Counsellors do non judge or exploit their leaf nodes in both way. (Counselling central). The twain principal(prenominal) therpaies within counselling that I depart focus on canvass on contrasting be somebody centerd counselling.PCT is a form of talk-psychotherapy highly- poseed by psychologist Carl Rogers in the 1940s and 1950s. The oddment of PCT is to provide clients with an opportunity to recrudesce a sense of self wherein they can realize how their attitudes, feelings and behavior be earthnessness banly guessed and put forward an hunting expedition to find their true overbearing electromotive force In this technique, healers create a comfortable, non-judgmental surround by demonstrating  congruity ( acceptedness), empathy, and un conformational appointed count toward their clients while using a non-directive approach.This aids clients in finding their bear solutions to their problems. Secondly Psycho compend is a psychological and psychotherapeutic theory c at one timeived in the easy 19th and early 20th centuries by Aust rian neurologist Sigmund Freud. analysis has expanded, been criticized and create in divers(prenominal) directions, mostly by some of Freuds colleagues and students, such as Alfred Adler, Carl Gustav Jung and Wilhelm Reich, and later by neo-Freudians such as Erich Fromm, K ben Horney, Harry Stack Sullivan and Jacques Lacan.The elemental tenets of psychoanalyticalalal therapy include the following beside the inherited nature of somebodyality, a soulfulnesss increase is determined by events in early childhood, human behaviour, experience, and cognition atomic number 18 generally determined by irrational push backs, those drives atomic number 18 said to be largely  unconscious(p). This burning(prenominal) aim of this assignment leave be taking two individual centred and psychoanalytic therapy and critically comparing them I will do this by giving an over post of the deuce therapies how they were essential, the principles they lie upon, what their tattleships be found on.We will then look at how they are similar and also how they differ by looking at the skills utilisationd and how they litigate as therapies to come to both do the same thing which is to booster a client overcome an issue in their sprightliness. individual centred therapy is based on the predilection that humans imbibe a drive to grow towards their potential and will act with the best interest to themselves, if they are provided the good atmosphere (Mcleod,2008). The direction of therapy is guided by the client with the support of the therapist. The client is eternally the expert on themselves if they are provided with the secure atmosphere for self-actualisation to occur.The central component macrocosm the client knows best the client knows where it hurts the most. The counsellors main motive is to relate to the client in such a way that he or she can find in that location sense of self direction. Carl Rodgers was the found er of psyche centred therapy. The development ancestormed from Rodgers experiences of being a client and wreaking as a counsellor (case more) Rodgers didnt like the view of behaviourist that humans were organisms that react to stimuli and developed habits from learned experiences.Therefor in his forward motion to as a counsellor became progressively uncomfortable with being the expert so began to develop a different view of what clients needed to experience in counselling, empathy congruity and unconditional positive regard. Rodgers proposed that human beings were always in the process of becoming quite a than being in a indomitable state. As humans we subscribe to a bun in the oven the captivity to develop in a essentially positive direction given the obligation conditions.Thats not to say that he vista throng are not some prison terms cruel or evil barely e genuinely person has the tendencies to discourses sloshed positive direction. Rodgers proposed that when t he conditions were growth promoting an individualistic could develop into a fully functioning person. Rodgers draw his approach as a basic philosophy preferably than a elementary technique which empowers the individual and tugs to private and neighborly transformation, purposeed in sympathetic understanding being non-judgemental and congruent.For this reason the person centred approach is often seen as touchy feel relation and seen as soft skilled that lacks structure, sometimes said as a way of preparing the road for real therapy. However it does have a clear theory of self, the creation of distrees and the tehraputic process. Its aims are transformational and asks the counsellor to be a human and transparent be real(langridge). Freud is regarded as the founder of in advance(p) psychology, developing psychoanalysis. The therapy is based on the floor that a great deal of the individual behavior are not within conscious control.Therefor the main violence is to help the client get to the darksome root of the problem often thought, to stem from childhood. Based on the principle that childhood experiences put our behavior as adults and effect out thinking processe, Freud be peppyd that these thoughts and feelings can begin repressed and may manifest themselves as depression or other negative symptoms. The client is able to reveal unconscious thought by talking freely aboput thought that enter their thought the analysis will attempt to interpratate and ask sence of the clients experiances. profoundly burtied experiances are expressed and the opportunity to make do tehase thoughts and feelings can help the client execution through thease problems. Clients are asked to fork out and reposition thougts and feelings they have towords people in their life on the analyst this process is called transfernace the success depends on how the analysats and client organise together. Psychoanalysis can be life changing if successful howver around 7 eld of therpay is needed to discover the full unconcious mind . regular sessions provide a aspect to explore there thoughts and make sence of them.psychoanalytical therapy is based on freuds work of pychoanalysis precisely less intensive it is found to be bennaficial for clients who want to understand more close to tehmselves and useful to people who feel tehir problems have affcted them for a long period of time and need reliving of frantic disstress. done deep exploration client and therapist try to understand the inner life of the client. Uncovering the uncocncious needs and thoughts may help the client understand how their prehistorical experiances affect their life today.It can also help them to work out how they can live a more fulfilling life. Person centred counselling and psychoanalytic therapy are both pip springs of devil great minded people Sigmund Freud and carl Rodgers the originators of these two approaches. Freud based his straighten upwork on his medical back ground , Rodgers was influenced by excistential phillosphy were the person is there central role in their growth and change. Some similarities can be drawn from a comparison betwewen the two models they both want to widen the concioussness but this is done in different means.Psychonalsis aims to make the unconscious conscious and by doing this helps the person gain controle over their thought and feelings. And the person cneterd approach helps the client to overcome a state of incongruence whilst psychoanalytic objective is two seek the repressed childhood experiances. The person centerd works through the concioussness by focusing on the here and now. Kahn (1985) compares the term incongruence with psychoanalytic defence mechanism repression. To him both are the same thing but different versions.Both prevent the person from being aware of his their suffer feelings the onluy diffrnece being that Rodgers belives by imputing the tenderness conditions of Two persons are in Psychologic al middleman, The first, whom we shall term the client, is in a state of incongruence, being vulnerable or anxious,The second person, whom we shall term the therapist is congruence or integrated in the blood,The therapist experiences unconditional positive regard for the client. The therapist experiences an sympathetic understanding of the clients internal frame of reference and endeavours to communicate this experience to the client.The discourse to the client of the therapists empathic understanding and unconditional positive regard is to a minimal degree achieved. because if thease are imputed incongruence will be shifted and psychoanalytic belive through interpretation of childhoon events repression can be acchived. Both psychoanalytic and person centred involve empathy that is applied to client and therapist, enabling the client to gain new understanding and head for the hills away from distress and towards harmony with self and others. Therefor potentially both try to in crease insight and strength towards the self. another(prenominal) areas that overlap are also discernable simple areas such as setting bounderies, along with assessment for therapy. From the first minuite of contact both persons become aware of their own and others aims, values and lifestyle by empathic attending. Both types of therapist are straightaway and open minded and accepting. In both therapies the therapist is bidden to provide a non judgemental reverential attitude towords the client. Both also overlap a commitment to the use of sleek over beliving it is an rough-and-ready tool for therapy commiting to listening without impediment.The similarities are healthfully guided by personal growth and development both have the interest of promoting self-reflection of the client. Their interest is to incite self-reflection of the clirnt. The birth is very important in both and the main reason for this is to gain a beter insight and clearer understanding of the client. The a im is to grade a relationship built on trust honesty and reliance on one another. The relationship is crucial in both therpays as without a meanspirited relationship there is no ground work in place for the client to feel safe to explore.Both models advertise the client to relase emotions and it is through tehase that empathy can be experienced. On the other hand psychoanalytic theory stresses the importance of unconscious procedures and sexual activity as the key terms for a deep understanding of the human pychopathology. Freud thought that dreams were the best way to explore the unconscious since they are disquised as the id whishes repressed by the ego in order to escape from awareness. The goal of counselling to Rodgers is the congruence of temper acchived when the self gains access to a form of experiances. he need for self actualisation can only be atteneded to once counsellor creates an atmosphere of unconditional positive regard and empathic understanding. There are c onsiderable diffrences between the two approaches ialthough express that they both create a strong knitted relationship between client ancd counsellor . person centers counselling the counsellor takes on a non directice role more like a companion rather than a leader and the client takes lead of the session were as psychodynamic counsellors take more of an authority figure in the relationship.Person centred firmly believes that the 6 core condition are necessary for change. Hoewever psychodynamic use of transferee is to make interpretation to the client for effective change. Person centred would see using transfer would not create a genuine relationship between counsellor and client. whizz of the central themes in person centred is the wildness on the present behaviours of the client. Psychodynamic focuses on the past and how it determines the present behaviours.Pychodyanmic counsellors choose to remain torpid during a session as this encourages conveyance a major tool in psyc hodynamic therapy. McLeod (2004) points out that in person revolve about counselling, questions are only asked to clients when necessary and may also answer questions if asked by clients, as this was supports to create the quality of the relationship. This again differs to the way Psychodynamic counsellors work as asking questions are pivotal during therapy as this elps to explore and configuration up relevant material, furthermore, it would be improbable for a psychodynamic counsellor to answer any(prenominal) personal questions by the client and or else try to figure out why the question is important. Although both see the relationship as crucial each therapy maintains a diferent way to responding to the client attitudes and values. for instance defences and transferance excist in both forms but handled in different ways. For person centerdit is a requirement that the core conditions are stimuiltaneous for the therapist thease core conditions repersent an openess to self expe rience and to the experience of another.Rodgers belived counsellors should be equalitarian in their have-to doe withings with clinets and a major diffrence concerns pychodynamic interpretations. visual aspect as all knowing and going beyond what is un-concious based mostly on theory rather than a clients spacific experiances. Thorne (1996) states that pychodynamic therpay may go to early in interpratation to make sence to clients Pychodynamic interpratation specifically concerns the naming of the unconcious for causeing problems that the clinet may be having.Only in the hermanutic meaning does the word interpratation make sence of things Hermeneutics applies to all persons who make sense of all situations, whereas psychodynamic interpretation in the compact sense is the most specific ingredient of psychodynamic therapys efforts to make positive changes for clients. in all in all psychodynamic approaches are based on freuds work based on the unconscious of the ID ego and super ego which emphasis on sexual aggression.Person centerd is based on the belief that humans have peculiar qualities for freedom and growth beliving that we are beyond being controlled by ID ego and superego not controlled by sexual urges. The similarities between both approaches promote and guide the idea of progress and development. There main interest to promote self reflection and awarenss for the client in order to do this they effectively use communication.Both approaches are the result of assumption the main diffrences lie at the foundations and what is belived to work best however sometimes they meet for what may be the best too to use at the time of hearapy. prehaps what makes any thrapy work is the belief that they can work if the client wants it to work there emotional needs and expectataions I belive that theory utilise does play a a very important role but it is the client who has the ability to change which ever root of therapy they take they can change no matter how t hey recive therapy weather it be in a humanistic approach or psychodynamic because if they expect it to work it will so maybe I am more for the person cneterd view as I belive that self actualisation and awarenss is very important to be able to facilitate growth.