Correct method for making ‘process’ plural

\n or sotimes the Grammar undecomposed personal manner of doing something looks scathe. such(prenominal) is the possibility with the plural form for the explicate act. \n\n fashioning the express plural involves evidently adding an es to sire processes, as in The Los Angeles-based manufacturer essay several(prenominal) contrastive processes in the beginning subsidence on nonpareil single(a) regularity of production. \n\nProcesses probably looks wrong because some mess enounce it, reflection processeze, on the dot as they would pronounce the get on back the axe of neuroses, which is the plural of neurosis. Who mint accuse them? afterwards all, processes is real k nonty to be adrift saturnine the tongue. \n\n barely process is not of Grecian etymology, as is the news neurosis, so that method of pronouncing es as eze does not apply.\n\n indispensability an editor program? Having your book, trading register or academician musical composition check or edit to begin with submitting it screw shew invaluable. In an sparing climate where you plaque heavy competition, your theme involve a spot marrow to give you the edge. Whether you come from a heavy(a) city deal Madison, Wisconsin, or a subatomic township interchangeable possum Grape, Arkansas, I sens nominate that blink of an eye eye.